Categories: NewsTech

Class action lawsuit over the MacBook’s butterfly keyboard design now officially certified

Apple‘s butterfly keyboard design has been a controversial one, to say the least. Introduced back in 2015 on the 12″ MacBook, it was supposed to take less space than the previous, more conventional scissor switches. However, users began to complain about a number of issues with the keyboard—most notably, that accumulated dust caused issues for the new keyboard.

Despite a number of incremental improvements over the next two years, the Cupertino-based company abandoned the idea for the scissor switch-based Magic Keyboard on the 2020 MacBook Pro—to everyone’s relief. However, a lawsuit was filed back in 2018, and now, a judge in California has just certified the class action lawsuit against Apple for the purportedly faulty keyboard design.

This is of some significance, with the class certification process being a crucial step in getting a class action lawsuit to trial. If the class is not certified, the case is dismissed, and things end there. However, now that the certification process is finished, the case will move onto the pre-trial stage as a full-blown class action lawsuit.

Who is involved?

Besides Apple (who are obviously the respondents), the class now includes anyone who purchased an Apple MacBook using the butterfly keyboard design across seven states: New Jersey, Washington, Florida, New York, Michigan, California, and Illinois. These involve the following devices:

  • MacBook (2015–2017)
  • MacBook Pro (2016–2019)
  • MacBook Air (2018–2019)

The premise of the action against Apple is that they knew that the butterfly switches were faulty—and that updates and revamps weren’t going to fix it in a permanent way. As reported by The Verge, an executive even likened upgrades to the butterfly keyboard to putting “lipstick” on “this pig”, which was “still ugly”.

As such, Apple has been accused of infringing on a number of state laws (across seven states), including the Unfair Competition Law in California and the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. In response, the Cupertino-based company argued that the action shouldn’t cover the multiple versions of the butterfly design as a class action—although the plaintiffs won out by referring to the same, fundamental design flaw of the butterfly keyboard used across multiple generations and devices.

“None of the design differences that Apple points to changed the tight spaces between the keys, nor the low-travel aspect of the design,” the order reads. Apple will have to argue later, in court, that these basic features didn’t actually make the design unreliable — and that it didn’t spend years knowingly making defective keyboards.”

[ SOURCE ]

Recent Posts

Puspakom backs officer as motorcycle trader ordered to pay RM80K over TikTok Live defamation

Puspakom Sdn Bhd (Puspakom) has reaffirmed its commitment to integrity and professional conduct following a…

20 hours ago

Huawei FusionSolar9.0 launches in Malaysia with AI-driven, grid-stabilising solar and energy storage solution

Huawei has launched its FusionSolar9.0 Smart PV & ESS solution in Malaysia, marking a shift…

21 hours ago

Hyundai Ioniq 6 N and Ioniq 5 N estimated price in Malaysia starts from RM450k

Hyundai Motor Malaysia (HMY) has officially opened the order books for its upcoming high-performance EV…

2 days ago

WCE now supports TNG eWallet PayDirect at all toll plazas

West Coast Expressway (WCE) is now PayDirect enabled and it is said to be the…

2 days ago

JomCharge x DBKL offers 50% off EV charging in Kepong this weekend

For this coming Labour Day holiday weekend, JomCharge x DBKL are offering 50% discount for…

2 days ago

Volvo offers Selekt certified used EVs from as little as RM153,000

Volvo Car Malaysia has released a limited batch of 100 Volvo Selekt Certified Used Cars…

2 days ago

This website uses cookies.